in the pics, your "client" is not exposing his genitals.under what claim do you pretend this to be child pornography.shirtless pics, even with some pubic hair exposed, is not child pornography.if your client is so concerned over underage pornographic pics, why did he have them taken by a professional.are you advocating children's rights to pose naked?seems odd to me.furthermore, there is no "commercial" gain on the part of the person who created this page.at least at this point in time, there are no ads generating revenue.no doubt the page creator found these pics elsewhere in the net, which stakes a claim for fair usage on this site.as it's likely your client himself posted these pics on the interwebs, he should expect them to be reposted elsewhere. fair usage entitlement.reporting the page creator to the legal authorities for child pornography crimes exposes you to a countersuit for harassment.none of the pictures are pornographic in content, nor do they show parts of the body which would allow such a claim, such as andy honda's dick, testicles, anus.if there was merit to your specious claims, blogger dot com itself would have removed the posts at your request.have you considered a career move to target torrent users ? internet trolls like you sometimes find this lucrative.
Cody And Andy Honda Corbin Fisher
2ff7e9595c
Comments